Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Upper-middle

Nokian

Line

R14 – R17

VS

Premium

Michelin

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Line

e.Primacy

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

6

4

1

4

Best position

#6

#3

#1

#2

Average position

12.2

12.0

1.0

3.3

Latest test

2018

2025

2026

Available sizes

53

111

66

40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Nokian Line

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

66%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Wet handling

Nokian Line

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Line

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

56%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Line

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Wet braking

Nokian Line

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Line

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

64%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Dry

Nokian Line

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Dry handling

Nokian Line

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Dry braking

Nokian Line

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

83%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Costs

Nokian Line

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Mileage

Nokian Line

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Line

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Comfort

Nokian Line

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

88%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Exterior noise

Nokian Line

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

90%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Nokian Line vs Nokian Wetproof

Nokian Line vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Nokian Line vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Nokian Line vs Firestone Roadhawk

Michelin e.Primacy vs Michelin Primacy 5

Michelin e.Primacy vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Michelin e.Primacy vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Michelin e.Primacy vs Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Browse by brand

GT

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Line

e.Primacy

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison