Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Upper-middle

Nokian

Line

R14 – R17

VS

Premium

Michelin

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Line

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

6

4

18

3

4

3

4

Best position

#6

#3

#1

#2

Average position

12.2

12.0

6.1

1.3

3.3

3.7

3.3

Latest test

2018

2025

2024

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

53

111

47

23

40

36

40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Confidence

Nokian Line

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Wet handling

Nokian Line

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Line

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

56%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Line

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Line

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

64%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet braking

Nokian Line

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dry

Confidence

Nokian Line

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Dry handling

Nokian Line

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

98%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry braking

Nokian Line

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry steering response

Nokian Line

60%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Dry lane changing

Nokian Line

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Costs

Confidence

Nokian Line

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Mileage

Nokian Line

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Line

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Comfort

Confidence

Nokian Line

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

88%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Exterior noise

Nokian Line

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

90%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Nokian Line

60%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

VS

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Also compare

Nokian Line vs Nokian Wetproof

Nokian Line vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Nokian Line vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Nokian Line vs Firestone Roadhawk

Michelin e.Primacy vs Michelin Primacy 5

Michelin e.Primacy vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Michelin e.Primacy vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Michelin e.Primacy vs Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Browse by brand

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Line

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison