18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Dunlop Winter

Test Profile

Nokian
Line
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Falken
e.Ziex
Dunlop
Winter
Number of tests
6
1
3
2
Best position
#6
#1
#2
#1
Average position
12.2
1.0
3.7
1.5
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
53
27
36
66

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Wet handling
Nokian Line
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Wet braking
Nokian Line
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dunlop Winter
84%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Dry handling
Nokian Line
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Dry braking
Nokian Line
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dunlop Winter
73%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Dunlop Winter
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison