18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Nokian
Line
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
6
4
49
1
Best position
#6
#2
#1
#1
Average position
12.2
3.3
3.2
1.0
Latest test
2018
2026
2024
2025
Available sizes
53
40
213
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Nokian Line
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Nokian Line
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet braking
Nokian Line
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry
Nokian Line
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Nokian Line
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Line
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Dry braking
Nokian Line
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry steering response
Nokian Line
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Dry driving behavior
Nokian Line
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Costs
Nokian Line
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Nokian Line
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
Nokian Line
30%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Fuel efficiency
Nokian Line
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Comfort
Nokian Line
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Interior noise
Nokian Line
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Comfort
Nokian Line
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store