18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Nokian
Line
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
6
18
21
4
6
1
Best position
#6
#1
#2
#2
#3
#1
Average position
12.2
6.1
11.9
3.3
4.7
1.0
Latest test
2018
2024
2024
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
53
47
165
40
146
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Nokian Line
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Nokian Line
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet braking
Nokian Line
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry
Nokian Line
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Nokian Line
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Nokian Line
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Costs
Nokian Line
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Nokian Line
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
Nokian Line
30%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Comfort
Nokian Line
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Interior noise
Nokian Line
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Comfort
Nokian Line
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store