Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Upper-middle

Nokian

Line

R14 – R17

VS

Upper-middle

Firestone

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

Line

Roadhawk

ION FlexClimate

Ecsta PS71

Number of tests

6

21

1

15

Best position

#6

#2

#1

#2

Average position

12.2

11.9

1.0

9.0

Latest test

2018

2024

2025

Available sizes

53

165

27

226

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Nokian Line

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Line

72%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Line

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Wet handling

Nokian Line

80%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Wet braking

Nokian Line

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Line

87%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry

Nokian Line

76%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry handling

Nokian Line

83%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Dry braking

Nokian Line

80%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Dry driving behavior

Nokian Line

74%

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Costs

Nokian Line

68%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Line

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Mileage

Nokian Line

63%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Price/value

Nokian Line

30%

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

63%

Fuel efficiency

Nokian Line

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

83%

Comfort

Nokian Line

68%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Exterior noise

Nokian Line

72%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Interior noise

Nokian Line

66%

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Nokian Line vs Nokian Wetproof

Nokian Line vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Nokian Line vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Firestone Roadhawk vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Uniroyal RainSport 5

Browse by brand

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Line

Roadhawk

ION FlexClimate

Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison