18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Nokian
Line
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
6
21
16
13
4
1
Best position
#6
#2
#3
#1
#2
#1
Average position
12.2
11.9
5.5
4.3
3.3
1.0
Latest test
2018
2024
2023
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
53
165
153
123
40
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Nokian Line
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Nokian Line
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet braking
Nokian Line
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry
Nokian Line
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Nokian Line
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Nokian Line
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry driving behavior
Nokian Line
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Costs
Nokian Line
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Nokian Line
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
Nokian Line
30%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Fuel efficiency
Nokian Line
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Comfort
Nokian Line
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Interior noise
Nokian Line
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store