18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Nokian
Line
Falken
e.Ziex
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
6
3
15
5
Best position
#6
#2
#2
#1
Average position
12.2
3.7
9.0
2.2
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
53
36
226
63

Wet

Wet
Nokian Line
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet handling
Nokian Line
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Line
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Line
84%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Nokian Line
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Line
87%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Line
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry handling
Nokian Line
83%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Dry braking
Nokian Line
80%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Line
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Mileage
Nokian Line
63%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Line
78%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Price/value
Nokian Line
30%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Line
68%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Nokian Line
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison