Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

Upper-middle

Nokian

Line

R14 – R17

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Line

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Turanza T005

Number of tests

6

3

1

33

Best position

#6

#2

#1

Average position

12.2

3.7

1.0

4.1

Latest test

2018

2025

Available sizes

53

36

66

658

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Nokian Line

84%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Line

72%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Line

84%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

80%

Wet handling

Nokian Line

80%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

89%

Wet braking

Nokian Line

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

79%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Line

87%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

86%

Dry

Nokian Line

76%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Dry handling

Nokian Line

83%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

89%

Dry lane changing

Nokian Line

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

84%

Dry braking

Nokian Line

80%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

88%

Dry steering response

Nokian Line

60%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

82%

Dry driving behavior

Nokian Line

74%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

85%

Costs

Nokian Line

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

81%

Mileage

Nokian Line

63%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

69%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Line

78%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

93%

Price/value

Nokian Line

30%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

53%

Fuel efficiency

Nokian Line

78%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

86%

Comfort

Nokian Line

68%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

77%

Exterior noise

Nokian Line

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

63%

Comfort

Nokian Line

60%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

66%

Interior noise

Nokian Line

66%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

VS

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Also compare

Nokian Line vs Nokian Wetproof

Nokian Line vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Nokian Line vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Nokian Line vs Firestone Roadhawk

Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.Ziex

Falken e.Ziex vs Continental UltraContact NXT

Falken e.Ziex vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Falken e.Ziex vs Michelin E.Primacy

Browse by brand

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

Line

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Turanza T005

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison