Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Continental UltraContact vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Upper-middle

Nokian

Line

R14 – R17

VS

Premium

Continental

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Line

UltraContact

Advantage

Roadhawk 2

Number of tests

6

1

14

6

Best position

#6

#7

#8

#3

Average position

12.2

7.0

13.4

4.7

Latest test

2018

2023

2026

Available sizes

53

88

153

146

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Confidence

Nokian Line

84%

Continental UltraContact

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Wet handling

Nokian Line

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Line

72%

Continental UltraContact

58%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Line

84%

Continental UltraContact

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Line

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Wet braking

Nokian Line

84%

Continental UltraContact

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Dry

Confidence

Nokian Line

76%

Continental UltraContact

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Dry handling

Nokian Line

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Dry braking

Nokian Line

80%

Continental UltraContact

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Costs

Confidence

Nokian Line

68%

Continental UltraContact

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Mileage

Nokian Line

63%

Continental UltraContact

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Line

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Comfort

Confidence

Nokian Line

68%

Continental UltraContact

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Exterior noise

Nokian Line

72%

Continental UltraContact

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Nokian Line vs Nokian Wetproof

Nokian Line vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Nokian Line vs Firestone Roadhawk

Continental UltraContact vs Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Continental UltraContact vs Firestone Roadhawk

Continental UltraContact vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Continental UltraContact vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Browse by brand

Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Continental UltraContact vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Line

UltraContact

Advantage

Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison