Comparison: Nokian Hakka Blue 3 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Upper-middle

Nokian

Hakka Blue 3

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Hakka Blue 3

Advantage

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

1

14

3

4

Best position

#2

#8

#2

Average position

2.0

13.4

3.7

3.3

Latest test

2024

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

31

153

36

40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Nokian Hakka Blue 3

93%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Wet handling

Nokian Hakka Blue 3

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Hakka Blue 3

100%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Hakka Blue 3

100%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Wet braking

Nokian Hakka Blue 3

100%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Hakka Blue 3

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Dry

Nokian Hakka Blue 3

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Dry handling

Nokian Hakka Blue 3

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Dry braking

Nokian Hakka Blue 3

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Comfort

Nokian Hakka Blue 3

90%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Exterior noise

Nokian Hakka Blue 3

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Comfort

Nokian Hakka Blue 3

100%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Costs

Nokian Hakka Blue 3

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Hakka Blue 3

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Nokian Hakka Blue 3 vs Nexen N blue 4 Season 2

Nokian Hakka Blue 3 vs Avon ZV7

Nokian Hakka Blue 3 vs Continental PremiumContact 7

Nokian Hakka Blue 3 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Maxxis Premitra HP5

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Michelin Primacy 4

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Browse by brand

Comparison: Nokian Hakka Blue 3 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Hakka Blue 3

Advantage

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison