Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Minerva Ice-Plus S210 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Minerva) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Minerva (0%). The first tyre test of Minerva Ice-Plus S210 was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the Ice-Plus S210 and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Minerva Ice-Plus S210
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Minerva Ice-Plus S210 Lowcost
2. Minerva Ice-Plus S210 35.33
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Minerva Ice-Plus S210 | 41,9 | - | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 31,4 | 30,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Minerva Ice-Plus S210 Rating: Not recommended | 4- | 2 | 4- | ||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||