18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Michelin
Primacy 5
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
5
18
4
1
3
Best position
#1
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
Average position
4.8
2.8
6.1
3.3
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2024
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
158
139
47
40
66
36

Wet

Wet
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison