18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
13
5
16
3
3
4
Best position
#1
#1
#3
#1
#2
#2
Average position
4.3
2.2
5.5
1.3
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2025
2025
2023
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
123
63
153
23
36
40

Wet

Wet
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet braking
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Wet handling
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dry handling
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dry lane changing
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Comfort
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Exterior noise
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Interior noise
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Mileage
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison