18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
13
18
4
3
1
3
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#4
#1
#2
Average position
4.3
6.1
3.3
4.3
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2025
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
123
47
40
99
66
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Dry
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry lane changing
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Comfort
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Costs
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Tread pattern comparison

Michelin Primacy 4+
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store