18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Michelin
Primacy 4+
Continental
UltraContact
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
13
1
18
1
4
3
Best position
#1
#7
#1
#1
#2
#2
Average position
4.3
7.0
6.1
1.0
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2025
2023
2024
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
123
87
47
66
40
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Dry
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Comfort
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Costs
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Tread pattern comparison

Michelin Primacy 4+
Continental UltraContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store