Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Michelin

Pilot Sport 4 S

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Pilot Sport 4 S

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Number of tests

10

1

4

3

Best position

#1

#2

Average position

2.1

1.0

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

195

66

40

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

84%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

87%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

88%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

88%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

85%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Dry

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

83%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

96%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry braking

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

95%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Comfort

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

75%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

70%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs Hankook Ventus Evo

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs Continental Sportcontact 7

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Hankook ION Evo vs Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Hankook ION Evo vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Hankook ION Evo vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Hankook ION Evo vs Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Browse by brand

Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Pilot Sport 4 S

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison