18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 S
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
10
4
15
Best position
#1
#2
#2
Average position
2.1
3.3
9.0
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
195
40
226

Wet

Wet
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet braking
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry braking
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Dry handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Comfort
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison