18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Nokian
WetProof
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
4
14
10
Best position
#5
#1
#2
Average position
10.3
5.6
6.0
Latest test
2018
2023
2026
Available sizes
47
109

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Nokian WetProof
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Nokian WetProof
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Nokian WetProof
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Costs
Confidence
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Nokian WetProof
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Nokian WetProof
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Nokian WetProof
46%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Nokian WetProof
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Dry
Confidence
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Nokian WetProof
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Nokian WetProof
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Comfort
Confidence
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Nokian WetProof
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store