18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Dunlop Winter

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Dunlop
Winter
Number of tests
4
5
2
Best position
#5
#1
#1
Average position
10.3
2.8
1.5
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
Available sizes
139
66

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Dunlop Winter
67%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Dunlop Winter
64%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Dunlop Winter
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison