18 shops · 56 ·847+ products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

Michelin Energy Saver +Premium
MichelinMichelin

Energy Saver +

R13
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

9.0
R15 – R22
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
4
1
23
3
Best position
#5
#1
#1
#2
Average position
10.3
1.0
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
—
66
176
36

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Tyres for EV carsBest dry-handling tyresBest rain tyresBest handling tyresQuietest tyresMost economical tyresBest anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Hankook ION Evo vs Pirelli P ZERO PZ4Hankook ION Evo vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6Hankook ION Evo vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Hankook ION Evo vs Bridgestone Potenza SportGoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 PGoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs Dunlop WINTERGoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs Dunlop Winter Sport 5GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Browse by brand

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison