Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Premium

Michelin

Energy Saver +

R13

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Energy Saver +

UltraGrip Performance+

ION Evo

Blizzak 6

Number of tests

4

23

1

14

Best position

#5

#1

Average position

10.3

3.3

1.0

3.6

Latest test

2018

2025

Available sizes

—

176

66

194

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Confidence

Michelin Energy Saver +

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

80%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Energy Saver +

62%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin Energy Saver +

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Wet handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Costs

Confidence

Michelin Energy Saver +

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

71%

Price/value

Michelin Energy Saver +

55%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Energy Saver +

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Mileage

Michelin Energy Saver +

94%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

41%

Comfort

Confidence

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Exterior noise

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Dry

Confidence

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

73%

Dry handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs Dunlop WINTER

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs Dunlop Winter Sport 5

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Hankook ION Evo vs Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Hankook ION Evo vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Hankook ION Evo vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Hankook ION Evo vs Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Browse by brand

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Energy Saver +

UltraGrip Performance+

ION Evo

Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison