18 shops · 56 ·847+ products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Michelin Energy Saver +Premium
MichelinMichelin

Energy Saver +

R13
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

9.5
R14 – R22
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Number of tests
4
4
1
24
Best position
#5
#2
#1
#1
Average position
10.3
3.3
1.0
2.7
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
—
40
66
302

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Tyres for EV carsBest dry-handling tyresBest rain tyresBest handling tyresQuietest tyresMost economical tyresBest anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.PrimacyHankook ION Evo vs Pirelli P ZERO PZ4Hankook ION Evo vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6Hankook ION Evo vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Hankook ION Evo vs Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Browse by brand

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison