18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
4
28
4
Best position
#5
#1
#2
Average position
10.3
2.3
3.3
Latest test
2018
2026
2026
Available sizes
67
40

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison