18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
4
5
3
15
Best position
#3
#1
#2
#2
Average position
12.0
2.8
3.7
9.0
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
111
139
36
226

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet braking
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet handling
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry braking
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Dry handling
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Rolling resistance
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Mileage
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison