18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
4
1
18
1
3
4
Best position
#3
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
Average position
12.0
1.0
6.1
1.0
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2025
2025
2024
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
111
27
47
66
36
40

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Wet braking
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet handling
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet side guide
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dry handling
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dry lane changing
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Mileage
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison