Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

e.Primacy

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Number of tests

4

1

4

18

3

Best position

#3

#1

#2

#1

#2

Average position

12.0

1.0

3.3

6.1

1.3

3.7

Latest test

2025

2026

2024

2026

2025

Available sizes

111

66

40

47

23

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Michelin e.Primacy

66%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin e.Primacy

56%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

74%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin e.Primacy

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet handling

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin e.Primacy

64%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet side guide

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Dry

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

93%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Michelin e.Primacy

83%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

98%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry steering response

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Dry lane changing

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

88%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Michelin e.Primacy

90%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

87%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

83%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

85%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Michelin e.Primacy vs Michelin Primacy 5

Michelin e.Primacy vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Michelin e.Primacy vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Michelin e.Primacy vs Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Hankook ION Evo vs Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Hankook ION Evo vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Hankook ION Evo vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Hankook ION Evo vs Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Browse by brand

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

e.Primacy

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison