18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
4
4
1
3
14
28
Best position
#3
#2
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
12.0
3.3
1.0
3.7
5.5
2.3
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
111
40
66
36
700
68

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet braking
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Wet handling
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Dry steering response
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Dry lane changing
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Mileage
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store