18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Dunlop
Winter
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Number of tests
4
4
2
28
23
24
Best position
#3
#2
#1
#1
#1
#1
Average position
12.0
3.3
1.5
2.3
3.3
2.7
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
111
40
66
67
176
302

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Wet braking
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Wet handling
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Dry braking
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Dry handling
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Dry steering response
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Dry lane changing
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Exterior noise
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Dunlop Winter
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Rolling resistance
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Mileage
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison