18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Number of tests
4
4
17
5
24
Best position
#3
#2
#1
#1
#1
Average position
12.0
3.3
1.7
2.8
2.7
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
111
40
80
139
302

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Wet braking
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Wet handling
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Dry
Confidence
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Dry braking
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Dry handling
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Dry lane changing
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Dry steering response
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Comfort
Confidence
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Exterior noise
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Costs
Confidence
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Rolling resistance
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Mileage
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store