18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
4
5
28
16
4
1
Best position
#3
#1
#1
#3
#2
#1
Average position
12.0
2.2
2.3
5.5
3.3
1.0
Latest test
2025
2025
2026
2023
2026
2025
Available sizes
111
63
67
153
40
66

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry lane changing
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison