18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
4
16
5
4
15
3
Best position
#3
#3
#1
#2
#2
#2
Average position
12.0
5.5
2.8
3.3
9.0
3.7
Latest test
2025
2023
2026
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
111
153
139
40
226
36

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Fuel efficiency
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Mileage
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison