18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Test Profile

Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Number of tests
4
3
4
5
29
Best position
#3
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
12.0
3.7
3.3
2.2
3.7
Latest test
2025
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
111
36
40
63
180

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Wet braking
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Wet handling
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Wet side guide
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Dry braking
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Dry handling
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Dry lane changing
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Dry steering response
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Exterior noise
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Rolling resistance
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Mileage
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison