18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
4
1
1
3
Best position
#3
#7
#1
#2
Average position
12.0
7.0
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2025
2023
2025
2025
Available sizes
111
88
66
36

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store