18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
4
1
18
1
3
4
Best position
#3
#7
#1
#1
#2
#2
Average position
12.0
7.0
6.1
1.0
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2025
2023
2024
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
111
88
47
66
36
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet braking
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Wet handling
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet side guide
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dry handling
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dry lane changing
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Mileage
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store