18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

Test Profile

Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Pirelli
Cinturato P7 C2
Number of tests
4
1
18
6
4
9
Best position
#3
#7
#1
#3
#2
#2
Average position
12.0
7.0
6.1
4.7
3.3
5.8
Latest test
2025
2023
2024
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
111
88
47
146
40
92

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
85%
Wet braking
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
80%
Wet handling
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
90%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
86%
Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
90%
Dry braking
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
92%
Dry handling
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
87%
Dry lane changing
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
93%
Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
89%
Exterior noise
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
83%
Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
64%
Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
65%
Rolling resistance
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
69%
Mileage
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
65%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store