18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
4
28
4
18
6
5
Best position
#3
#1
#2
#1
#3
#1
Average position
12.0
2.3
3.3
6.1
4.7
2.8
Latest test
2025
2026
2026
2024
2026
2026
Available sizes
111
67
40
47
146
139

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Wet braking
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet handling
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry braking
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry handling
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Dry lane changing
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolling resistance
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Mileage
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison