18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Linglong Sport Master vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Linglong
Sport Master
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
10
14
5
Best position
#1
#8
#1
Average position
10.4
13.4
2.8
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
151
153
139

Wet

Wet
Linglong Sport Master
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Wet handling
Linglong Sport Master
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Linglong Sport Master
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Wet braking
Linglong Sport Master
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Linglong Sport Master
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet circle cornering
Linglong Sport Master
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%

Dry

Dry
Linglong Sport Master
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry braking
Linglong Sport Master
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry handling
Linglong Sport Master
57%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%

Costs

Costs
Linglong Sport Master
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolling resistance
Linglong Sport Master
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Mileage
Linglong Sport Master
48%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Price/value
Linglong Sport Master
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Comfort

Comfort
Linglong Sport Master
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
Linglong Sport Master
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Comfort
Linglong Sport Master
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2025225/40 R18View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison