Comparison: Linglong Green-Max vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Budget

Linglong

Green-Max

R13 – R19

VS

Upper-middle

Firestone

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Green-Max

Roadhawk

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

3

21

3

5

Best position

#13

#2

#1

Average position

18.0

11.9

3.7

2.8

2.2

Latest test

2020

2024

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

17

165

36

139

63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Linglong Green-Max

66%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Wet braking

Linglong Green-Max

80%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Wet circle cornering

Linglong Green-Max

90%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

94%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Linglong Green-Max

40%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Linglong Green-Max

60%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Dry

Linglong Green-Max

79%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry handling

Linglong Green-Max

85%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

93%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dry braking

Linglong Green-Max

88%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Comfort

Linglong Green-Max

90%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

Linglong Green-Max

90%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Comfort

Linglong Green-Max

65%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Costs

Linglong Green-Max

56%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolling resistance

Linglong Green-Max

56%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook Ventus Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Linglong Green-Max vs Linglong ComfortMaster

Linglong Green-Max vs Continental PremiumContact 6

Linglong Green-Max vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Linglong Green-Max vs Maxxis Premitra HP5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Firestone Roadhawk vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

Browse by brand

Comparison: Linglong Green-Max vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Green-Max

Roadhawk

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison