Comparison: Linglong Green-Max HP010 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Budget

Linglong

Green-Max HP010

R14 – R17

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Green-Max HP010

Ecsta HS52

Advantage

Efficient Grip Performance

Number of tests

1

10

14

16

Best position

#16

#2

#8

#3

Average position

16.0

6.0

13.4

5.5

Latest test

2019

2026

2023

Available sizes

44

109

153

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Linglong Green-Max HP010

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Aquaplaning - cross

Linglong Green-Max HP010

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

Wet handling

Linglong Green-Max HP010

57%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Linglong Green-Max HP010

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Wet braking

Linglong Green-Max HP010

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Wet circle cornering

Linglong Green-Max HP010

50%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Comfort

Linglong Green-Max HP010

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Exterior noise

Linglong Green-Max HP010

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Interior noise

Linglong Green-Max HP010

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Costs

Linglong Green-Max HP010

53%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Mileage

Linglong Green-Max HP010

40%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Dry

Linglong Green-Max HP010

59%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Dry driving behavior

Linglong Green-Max HP010

54%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Linglong Green-Max HP010 vs Linglong ComfortMaster

Linglong Green-Max HP010 vs Nankang Econex NA-1

Linglong Green-Max HP010 vs Vredestein ULTRAC

Linglong Green-Max HP010 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Browse by brand

GT

Comparison: Linglong Green-Max HP010 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Green-Max HP010

Ecsta HS52

Advantage

Efficient Grip Performance

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison