18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Linglong Green-Max HP010 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Toyo Proxes Comfort vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Linglong
Green-Max HP010
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Toyo
Proxes Comfort
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
4
17
3
Best position
#16
#2
#5
#2
Average position
16.0
3.3
9.5
3.7
Latest test
2019
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
44
40
126
36

Wet

Wet
Linglong Green-Max HP010
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
69%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Linglong Green-Max HP010
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
66%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Linglong Green-Max HP010
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
80%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Linglong Green-Max HP010
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Linglong Green-Max HP010
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
73%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Linglong Green-Max HP010
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Comfort

Comfort
Linglong Green-Max HP010
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Linglong Green-Max HP010
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Linglong Green-Max HP010
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
67%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Linglong Green-Max HP010
40%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
66%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dry

Dry
Linglong Green-Max HP010
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison