18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Linglong Green-Max HP010 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

Linglong
Green-Max HP010
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
1
18
3
6
Best position
#16
#1
#2
#3
Average position
16.0
6.1
3.7
4.7
Latest test
2019
2024
2025
2026
Available sizes
44
47
36
146

Wet

Wet
Linglong Green-Max HP010
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Wet braking
Linglong Green-Max HP010
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Linglong Green-Max HP010
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Linglong Green-Max HP010
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Wet handling
Linglong Green-Max HP010
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Linglong Green-Max HP010
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%

Comfort

Comfort
Linglong Green-Max HP010
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Linglong Green-Max HP010
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Dry

Dry
Linglong Green-Max HP010
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%

Costs

Costs
Linglong Green-Max HP010
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Mileage
Linglong Green-Max HP010
40%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison