18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Number of tests
10
49
3
24
Best position
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
12.2
3.2
3.7
2.7
Latest test
2024
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
207
213
36
302

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Wet braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Wet handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Snow
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Snow traction
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Snow braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Snow handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
61%
Snow cornering
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Exterior noise
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Interior noise
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
Costs
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Rolling resistance
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Mileage
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Price/value
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Offroad
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Dry
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Dry braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Dry handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store