• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Kumho (63%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ has a better rating of 87% compared to 77% of the Kleber KRISALP HP3. The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ was done in 2025, compared to 2017 when was the Kleber KRISALP HP3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the WinterCraft WP52+ and the KRISALP HP3 were tested. See more mutual tests below.

# Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
/87%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
/77%

Add to comparison

Kumho
Kleber
DimensionsR0 - R21 R14 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

2

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+2+1–1
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Rating: Good
2+ 2+ 1– 2
Kleber Krisalp HP3
Rating: Satisfactory
32+ 12+
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetSnow
Best values in test32.627.1
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+33.528.3
Kleber Krisalp HP336.227.1
Show test details