Comparison: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

e.Primacy

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

Number of tests

5

4

5

3

Best position

#1

#3

#1

#2

Average position

4.4

12.0

2.8

3.7

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

99

111

139

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

56%

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet braking

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Hankook Ventus Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

64%

Hankook Ventus Evo

94%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

85%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

93%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry lane changing

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook Ventus Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook Ventus Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Firestone Roadhawk 2

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Firestone Firehawk Sport

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Michelin e.Primacy vs Michelin Primacy 5

Michelin e.Primacy vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Michelin e.Primacy vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Michelin e.Primacy vs Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Browse by brand

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

e.Primacy

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison