18 shops · 56 ·847+ products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

8.5
R17 – R22
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
10
4
3
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#2
Average position
4.4
6.0
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
99
109
40
36

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Tyres for EV carsBest dry-handling tyresBest rain tyresBest handling tyresQuietest tyresMost economical tyresBest anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Kumho Ecsta PS71Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Firestone Roadhawk 2Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Firestone Firehawk SportKumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Bridgestone Potenza SportKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kumho Ecsta HS51Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Browse by brand

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison