18 shops · 56 ·847+ products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

8.5
R17 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

8.2
R14 – R22
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Number of tests
5
4
49
Best position
#1
#2
#1
Average position
4.4
3.3
3.2
Latest test
2026
2026
2024
Available sizes
99
40
213

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Dry lane changing
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Tyres for EV carsBest dry-handling tyresBest rain tyresBest handling tyresQuietest tyresMost economical tyresBest anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Also compare

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Kumho Ecsta PS71Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Firestone Roadhawk 2Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Firestone Firehawk SportKumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Bridgestone Potenza SportGoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Browse by brand

PirelliMichelinHankookGoodyearNokianFalkenVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenMaxxisBridgestone

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison