18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
5
18
13
3
4
5
Best position
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
4.4
6.1
4.3
3.7
3.3
2.2
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
99
47
123
36
40
63

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Dry lane changing
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store