18 shops · 56 ·847+ products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Falken e.Ziex

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

8.5
R17 – R22
Firestone RoadhawkUpper-middle
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.2
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Firestone
Roadhawk
Falken
e.Ziex
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
21
3
3
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#2
Average position
4.4
11.9
3.7
3.7
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
99
165
36
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
92%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Dry
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Costs
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVsBest dry-handling tyresBest rain tyresBest handling tyresQuietest tyresMost economical tyresBest anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Firestone Roadhawk 2Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Kumho Ecsta PS71Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Firestone Firehawk SportKumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Bridgestone Potenza SportFirestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNFirestone Roadhawk vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Browse by brand

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store