18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Firestone
Roadhawk
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
21
3
Best position
#1
#2
#2
Average position
4.4
11.9
3.7
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
Available sizes
99
165
36

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
92%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison